Again, i think the allegations are against TPL were based on the bundling of licenses----artifical/ lower amount in some licensings--- and certain expenses that were being charged on PDS.

This suit or claim against TPL is to squeeze them into changing some "rules"... and putting PTSC in a better position to participate in the decision making of the licensing IMO.

Ptsc let some double dipping slide in the beginning (Core/MMP signings)... but they probably had enough after it was becoming too common and the MMP getting too low of a value assigned by TPL.

I bet we see an amended master agreement--- the issues get resolved--- and both companies go back to collecting $$$$$$....

Both sides need each other------- this is like the star football who holds out to renegotiate his contract ( because he feels he has outplayed it..etc)... vs the owner who wants the player to honor an agreement signed years ago...

after a few weeks of drama..... both are hugging and kissing and life goes on...