"What's a shareholder to think?"

Which begs the question. For what purpose?

That question crossed my mind too, on more than one occasion, for the simple reason that Mr Caplan not only articulated his experience in corporate affairs, but also had the support of well-respected posters, two of whom have legal knowledge.

It was obvious that any proposal for inclusion on the proxy would have been denied under SEC Rule 14a-8, as Mr Lozano's was.

Was it to gather shareholder information, perhaps? I don't know, as any questions on the matter are ignored.

.

.

.

Be well