Wolf:

You missed the additional bolding I made below...

TPL have any motive to delay, as it is TPL’s patents that have been infringed by the Plaintiffs, and TPL that is entitled to at least a reasonable royalty for that infringement. TPL provided Plaintiffs with ample notice of its amended infringement contentions so as not to affect the Court-ordered case schedule and derail its significant damages claim against the Plaintiffs.

I think this is telling.

Cheers:

DG