"It is true - Caplan got Sign off money" - You mean the Commercialization Agreement-of course. How is it that Stan and others here seem to be portraying him as some sort of victim in all of this? How can you and those of you who seem to be in a continuing and organized effort going to such great lengths to defend to him and his half-hearted effort for a BOD seat and say it all with a straight face while he - in your way of looking at things - helped get us all into this mess by signing the very agreement the details with which you have such problems?

"The amount quoted would be less than 10% of what Swartz got and less than 5% of what Lincoln got."

OK - Then Stan Caplan is only a small portion of the warrant anchor that has helped hold the share price down.

I guess this guilt-free rationale is similar to the guilt-free griping that Ron does when he simultaneously unloads a bunch of shares and is sitting on virtually free shares while complaining endlessly about how this current BOD is not providing enough shareholder value.

You guys seem to think you can turn a phrase just so and we will all be baffled by your BS.

Not so.