I suggested that shareholders read Item 10 on page 36, to understand what qualifications and experience the BoD possesses, "which are important to our business".

In July, the request for my BoD appointment was sent to PTSC. This letter has been posted here. For those that missed it, a couple of weeks ago I did make it clear that I was no longer interested.

Part of the response from Patriot's attorney was that my "experience would not contribute unique or needed skills". Did they say something similar to Pete Lorenzo? What about others that come forward to make a difference?

Instead of magnifying and tearing apart every detail of a potential BoD candidate's qualifications and experience, maybe shareholders should be asking questions like:

Would you do proper due diligence before or after you make an investment?

Would you loan Dan Leckrone/TPL $1 million unsecured?

Would you understand what the shareholders are enduring and accept compensation based on share performance?

And many others that have factual foundation from the 10K.

Wake up, folks! I don't know how much more of this "leadership, finance and industry experience"(page 36), our company can take.

Stan