Back to the begining would imply that PTSC may be allowed to use Higgins' testimony in any ownership litigation.... That we know wouldn't be the case since Fed Judge Fogal cut PTSC's case re Higgins off at the knees..

Perhaps I have missed something.. what has changed? Leckerone & TPL lying and cheating to the point of being criminal has implications on the MA/CA... not imo ownership of patents (outside of the disput b/t Moore/TPL)

Best case senario imo (wtfdik) would be the MA/CA being ammended to the point where PTSC has greater control and power.. to at least equal to that of Leckerone/TPL.. with appropriate system control/monitoring.. and no Core/Flash/MMP portfolio combined licensing...

Then start to license MMP for what the patents are really worth

jmo