My question to each of our directors is, what have you done for us lately and why should you continue to hold your current position as a director? Why should Pete and or Stan have to justify in writing why they should be considered for the board without our current directors being required to prove to us why they should continue to hold their board positions?

What have you done for shareholders since the ASHM to bring value to all of us? I would appreciate a detailed monthly accounting of activities, since that meeting, from each director to support their overall individual compensation. Do you think that is too much to ask for?

If they are confident in what they have been doing for all of us, then they should have no objections (zero, nada) to providing us with such a report. In doing so, they must also be ready and willing to resign, if there is no justification for the paychecks they have been receiving.