Thank you so much for yet another attempt to discredit my competence by suggesting that I somehow have relied on a single provision within the new Rule 14a-11 regulations.

Further to your erroneous hypothesis and delightful diatribe, I would humbly refer you to the following in which it clearly articulates the definition by which "Accelerated Filers" are outwith Rule 14a-11:

http://agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forums/discussion/topics/439838-gullibility-test/messages/1436930#message

I would be more than happy for anyone who has looked for your suggested "exceptions" and "exceptions to the exceptions", as I have done in great depth, to categorically refute my interpretation by citing the relevant section, instead of expecting the opinion of one who "doesn't know the answer" to be the definitive statement of fact.

Perhaps a new fund, P.L.O.P - Pete Lorenzo's Other Plan, could be established to meet the costs of consulting a lawyer experienced in the field of SEC Regulations?

.

.

.

Be well