From your post:

"precluding TPL from executing any license of the MMP patents without providing us five business days' notice of the proposed MMP license and any other proposed license with the licensor, in order to allow us time to seek redress if we are dissatisfied by the proposed licenses .."

From what you posted about the 5 day notice, does that mean that if PTSC did not like the deal ( because TPl structures the sale to include its own other patents as a package deal ) that PTSC could block the license? How do you intrepret that part of the ruling? I am seeing this license as an action that PTSC did approve of. Do you or anyone else here think PTSC has blocked any licenses? TIA

Also, upon reading your post, I began to wonder if that is 5 business days or 5 calendar days. I decided to just assumed 5 business days. And then I looked at a chart for PTSC on StockCharts.com (http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui)

I see there, to my way of interpretation, that the down trend line was broken to the upside on Friday the 17th. That would be 5 business days before the formal announcement. I thought that was an interesting correlation.

I personally do not think the license sale was the real reason for the move up. But this makes me think that it might be more likely than I thought before.

My question about what made PTSC agree to the license sale makes me more curious. Did TPL and PTSC come to some sort of agreement just for this sale? Or some agreement of a larger scale? Will that be revealed by the court on Sept. 30th? Has there been some significant change that has taken place? Some change that has to do with something other than PTSC and TPL? Like PDSG?