Let's just say Moore prevails and the MMP becomes his property exclusive of TPL, how would that effect the MA, The Operating Agreement, The commercialization agreement.

According the MA TPL has only been granted the rights (by Moore) to license the patents. Somewhere along the way from then till now, Moore says that TPL duped him into giving up all rights and beneficial ownership to the MMP patent portfolio, right?

If Moore can prove that he alone owns the rights (ownership) to the patents, how would that effect the MA, The Operating Agreement, the Commercialization Agreement (etc.) if those documents were originally conceived with the notion that Moore only gave licensing rights to TPL? The agreements only speak to an arrangement for marketing and do not state anywhere that TPL owns the patents themselves. corrections welcome

There are grounds to terminate the Com Ag agreement which I previously posted. So unless we can figure out what Patriot's complaint is really all about, or if TPL is insolvent, how would the MA, ComAG, Operating Agreement etc. be terminated?