1. Not sure what conflict of interest we would have with PDS? PDS is a JV with TPL.. so it makes sense that some of same members would need to be involved.

Regarding other companies-- nothing new or fraud about that.... people people hold shares in other companies or BOD positions...

2. Shares can be bought and sold... we have no control over that... and i doubt anything in this discovery process/court process would show anything regarding this.

3. Which books? PTSC? they are audited and they must follow all the rules regarding as public company--- nothing there is going to be shady..... the books of PDS could be another story. Even there i highly doubt PTSC or even TPL is doing anything fraudalent. ...

I think people are trying to make this into something more than it is. its simple....

TPL and PTSC are having conflicts over over the final pricing of the mmp and probably the controls over the business costs of selling the mmp ( not the legal costs since this was defined earlier on).

PTSC got in this positon because i think they a. failed to realized how successfull and how much money the MMP was really going to bring in b. their weak position in the master agreement.

PTSC didnt give a care in the world when 100 million came their way....... but when the money stopped... they realized they needed to make a stronger say/participation in the process.

The stuff between Moore and TPL---- doesnt really affect PTSC IMO... because i think DL has his bases covered regarding the ownership of the MMP. a lawyer vs a wacky inventor---- my bets are on the lawyer. Im not saying DL didnt trick Moore , or didnt take advantage of the situation-- or isnt a snake------ but im sure he did the correct process for the ownership.