This seems to be the most interesting parts:

STIPULATION CONTINUING CASE SCHEDULING DATES

BARCO N.V., a Belgian corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LTD., PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORP., ALLIACENSE LTD.,
Defendants.

WHEREAS, the parties have diligently met and conferred as to claim construction and have made significant progress; WHEREAS, because Barco’s counsel have been traveling in Asia during the past week, it is difficult for Barco to meet the October 21, 2010 deadline; WHEREAS, because of the scheduling conflicts caused by the time difference between Asia and California, parties have been recently unable to schedule conference calls in which all counsel of record could participate to finalize the Statement for filing with the Court by October 21, 2010; WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred as to these issues, and agreed that the Scheduling Order be modified as follows to allow more time to finalize the Statement; ACCORDINGLY, it is HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties and their counsel of record, who respectfully request that the Court order the dates in the Current Scheduling Order be modified