"But he said "probably". Not, probably didn't. I want to know what he is basing that statement on. Should be difficult to answer. Does he have reliable information, or is he pulling it out of his a$$? Simple question."

My vote is that he is pulling out of his a$$ and the docs have nothing to do with prior art.

The USPTO looked how long for prior art!!?? The infrining companies have looked how hard/long for prior art!!!??? What have they found? There is no prior art.

I'm willing to bet that the documents state something regarding the ownership of the patents. Isn't this Moore's pet peeve? Wasn't there an infringing company jumping all over "who really owns the patents" at one point?