Re: According to Barco,the 336 has problems,they put their money where (Opty
posted on
Feb 12, 2011 06:13PM
<if TPL substantively amended claims 6 and 10 during the reexamination of the ’336 patent, TPL is only entitled to recover damages for alleged infringement occurring after the completion of the reexamination.>
Even if the the above is the case, wouldn't they still be infringing on claim #1 from day #1 of the infringement notification. Claim #1 does not contain the external/off-chip amendment which is being argued above, and does contain the essence of the invention.
Is it necessary to infringe on more than one claim?
Opty