<I do not believe responding to the SJM will achieve that result.>

And you might be right. I only said may, not will.

<Under the above position you believe TPL took, explain how in an actual negotiation would reach a real, conclusive and specific monetary amount agreement. >

Simple. Provide Judge Ward's construction of variable speed clock and show processor specs or other literature which would indicate that the processors abc and xyz etc.. are capable of operating at more than one frequency and the existence of a second clock. IMO, that would be sufficient for license negotiations, but not litigation.

Hope you are not expecting me to acutally try to figure a monetary amount. Multiple claims of multiple patents and I have no clue as to the numbers of processors etc...

Opty