< a Markman will be needed if he rules for TPL/PTSC, but not if he rules for the plaintiffs,>
Wow! I thought only Barco would benefit from SJ in their favor. I thought that is what you said?
Perhaps I'm misinterpeting what you are saying above, but it is hard to consture it differently. No Markman = we lost the 336 against Acer and HTC as well as Barco . Is there some other meaning to that sentance?
Opty