Well, then you take it wrong, IMO.

Perhaps you missed a brief discussion between me and Pete on this very subject.

My understanding, which has not been corrected by anyone for being wrong, is that until 14a-11 goes into effect for PTSC, three years out, no person can force their way onto the ballot. The only acceptable candidates will be those approved by the BoD. If none are found, there are no candidates except the incumbents. So, as in the past, whether or not they get a majority vote is moot. If there are three seats available, and only three candidates (the incumbents), guess what happens?

I'm open to correction. BTW, this is one reason why I concluded long, long ago that the only way for a person to become a candidate was if they were invited by the BoD. The other side of my reasoning is that if one were not invited/welcome, and they actually got on the BoD, what could they possibly accomplish when consistently facing a 2-1 vote, opposed to your proposition?

Thus the pointlessness of "replace the BoD" discussion IMO. Wait about two years, then bring it up, and act on it! Even then, if there is only one replacement, they'd be facing the 2-1 vote problem. It may not be the way we'd prefer, but it is the way it is.

SGE