Why? He hasn't denied it has he? Furthermore, he explained why he posted the PACER late and from one side of SGE1's mouth was thanked for the quick explanation and, from the other, wound up being accused of manipulation, deception and dishonesty, and was berated for failure to provide the PACER "service" in the manner that SGE1 saw fit. Then others on other boards chimed in with their ankle-biting and eye-poking posts. Would YOU feel compelled to respond to requests from anyone who behaved as such? This was the quintessential example of "no good deed goes unpunished".

I don't blame him for deciding not to post here anymore. And the date issue has no bearing on anything other than an unfounded conslusion being reached by certain people, and then attempt to manufacture an interpretation of circumstances that would support that conclusion.

We'll have to humbly agree to disagree on this issue.