pappy / Re: SGE1 / Re: Just some FACTS & opinions. gloves
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 11, 2011 08:06PM
"I'm really bewildered that it is being defended with such passion without any reasonable explanation."
And I'm just as bewildered that a person who has been so generous with his time, money and information, is being character assasinated the way he is. I don't dispute the 4 isn't there. There could be any number of reasons why, but the fact is it makes no difference whether there was a 4 in the date or not. The PACER posting had no bearing on anything.
I understand you may have some personal issues with Wolf and I don't agree with his banning of you in the past, but I don't agree with the banning of anyone, frankly, except for the obvious spam postings we get from time to time. I'm perfectly content with self-censoring what I read here, and welcome the opportunity to refute incorrect factual posting, and unfounded opinion, as I've done with this one.
I still live in a country where you're innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof is on SGE1, with his wild accusations of lying, deceipt and manipulation. I don't agree that the pivotal issue is the date, IMO, the pivotal issue is how can people such as SGE1, Opty, You, Greeneyes, Franfurt (who correct me if I'm wrong but I think is Fatwollit of old here), etc. etc, drag a person's reputation (albeit simply a virtual one) through the mud and accuse him of lying and trying to cheat everyone without a shred of any REAL proof or facts.