Re: List... CC
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 11, 2011 08:52PM
About TPL. What I always found strange was their approach to licensing. Keeping the license amounts secret so that other infringers would not know how much they paid for a license. As if they would not just get on the phone and secretly inform each other. It would now seem apparent that the reasoning for the above was so they could intermingle FLASH and MMP to their advantage. However, our BOD must have never verified license amounts with the infringers. Never. And never found out until Barco made public statements about Leckrones dealings. Why didn't the other infringers mention the discrepancies. Could it be because they got discounts? It was none of their business? They didn't mind being manipulated because it was only nuisanse fees, when it could have been much more? If our BOD knew nothing then I would think they would not settle out of court. They would want a full reckoning of all money due to us. But, to my surprise, now TPL will be getting more money for costs. Could it be that our BOD knew all along about the severe cost incurred by TPL and just kept a blind eye? Or, is that to just create an illusion of justification? Something very strange has been going on. I only hope that authorities will also think so and get to the truth of the matter for all concerned. Which should be primarily for the investors.
Also, beware of expense accounts. Even George Washington used them to his advantage. I hate to even think about that aspect in addition to the above.
All just questions dictated by actions kept secret. (for some reason?)
.
This post by CenturyCom is one of the main reason I take the BoD to task.. amongst all the other reasons...
.
excellent posts as late CC