When you make that frequent comparison between PTSC (historically predominately negative sentiment) versus EDIG (historically predominately positive sentiment), you IMO somehow manage to make the point and MISS the point concurrently. And, interestingly, you appear to acknowledge the existence of these "historicals".

Some here say that the ongoing negative sentiment reflected on this and other message boards has had an ongoing negative impact on PTSC's PPS (suppression). Key word: "ongoing". While I agree that a particular bit of extra bad or extra good news will cause short term blips up/down, that key word "ongoing" is the issue. Negative vibe constant, suppressed PPS constant.

Then look at EDIG. Look closely at what is known. Look at the fundamentals, their product market penetration/maturity, their patents (and where they are at and number of probable infringers), their float and issued Preferred Shares, and their management performance. Now, at what PPS SHOULD EDIG be trading? Would that PPS be higher or lower than where it's at? And if you concluded that EDIG is probably trading at a somewhat higher PPS than is truly deserved with their circumstance, then what does that tell you? The positive sentiment has been a constant. IMO, a somewhat inflated PPS has been a constant.

An absolute sober, honest assessment and a perfectly appropriate-to-circumstance PPS would be the Utopian situation. But the constant sentiment of the vocal, positive or negative, does play a role IMO.

THIS is the point I and others have been trying to get across. Hopefully this time the clarification will help.

Along these lines, my hope for this message board is to achieve some sort of realistic balance. This IMO is the only path towards the aforementioned Utopian situation. Let the perceived positives and negatives have at least equal footing. After all, regardless of how one may weigh positives versus negatives, one fact holds true - you still own shares. Thus, regardless of how many negatives you see floating there must be some perceived balance in your mind against the positives you see floating, or no reasonable person would stay invested. Depict that balance here. IMO it is the honest thing to do, and would best serve all participants/prospective participants.

JMHOs,

SGE