In reading through the docs filed in this case, the following documents will help you to follow what has been happening since late 2010:

64- Resp by TPL and ALL to Moore's NTC of related cases

66- Opposition by PTSC to motion to compel compliance with bus. records subpoena:req for sanc, Charles Hoge

68- Opposition to PTSC motion for protective order re: bus records subpoena

73 - PTSC motion for protective order is denied; Def Phil Marcoux's motion to compel compliance with subpoena is granted; Def's request for sanctions is denied

77- PLTs and cross def's ex parte appl for protective order

78- OST for motion for Protective order is set 12/3/10

84- Marcoux opp to ex parte motion for protective order

92- Ex parte appl for osc/tro re: prelim injunction (for Phil Marcoux)

96- Phil...amendment to X-Complaint

98- Ex parte to show cause for prelim injunction and TRO is denied

119- Order allowing amendment to X/C of Phil Marcoux

125- Order for motion for leave to file 1st amended cross complaint is granted 3/3/11

127 - 1st amended cross complaint against APPLE, Inc. 3/3/11

137 - for Phil- discovery motion granted

142 - TL ex parte appl for relief from waiver of objection or in the alternative OST on motion for relief by PLT

156 - granting stipulation to continue motion for relief from waiver of objection

157 - First Paper Def - unltd for Apple, paid on stip & order extending time to respond

158 Order granted to extend time to 5/5/11

161 - Ex parte app for Apple for order extending time to respond to 1st amended complaint

165 - Order granting exparte appl for an order xtending time to respond until 5/20/11

Can anyone figure our what is going on here other than Apple has until Friday to respond to the 1st amended complaint?