"Obviously, he will argue that the value of PTSC stock is related to the value of the MMP patents. The Lower he can prove MMP patent values the better he can justify his allocation of past license revenues between his own patents and the MMP"

That would be like the caretaker of your car collection scratching up your cars then saying they are not worth as much while having a vested interest of gaining something from the decreased value. Lets just use the but for argument. But for TPL and the allegations put forth what would the PPS be for PTSC. IMO