My post responds to milestone's post citing language in the M.A. to justify why PTSC CAN'T issue a PR regarding this issue. I was simply pointing out the error of that conclusion
Isn't PTSC suing TPL, in part, for breach of contract?
Is it being suggested that PTSC should likewise breach the contract by issuing PRs without the consent of TPL?
I have never believed that "two wrongs made a right".
.
.
.
Be well