Barco is suing in both San Jose and San Francisco Divisions? Also, any significance to PTSC being the "defendant" in one case, with TPL, PTSC, & Alliacence, in the other?

From PACER wolf posted today:

New Pacer--NOTICE RESCHEDULING TIME OF
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
BARCO NV,
Plaintiff,
v.
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORP., ET AL.,
Defendant.

NOTICE RESCHEDULING TIME OF
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

and from one he posted on July 20th:

2nd Pacer--TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED’S AND ALLIACENSE LTD.’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR A SEALING ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
BARCO N.V., a Belgian corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LTD.,
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORP.,
ALLIACENSE LTD.,
Defendants.

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED’S AND ALLIACENSE LTD.’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR A SEALING ORDER