Yes, I just read the 3 page PDF from Moore. If he is telling the truth that our BOD said they would work with him and then they didn't that is breach of contract. It may have just been verbal, then hard to enforce. Why didn't Moore get it in writing? Hasn't he learned anything from his past experience? He trusted our BOD??? He should have gotten it in writing IMO. And my belief is that if they had stuck together as two against one unspeakable person they would have had a better chance. We all keep watching. You and others keep revealing more and "Moore" information. One day it may all become clear. Until then I am holding on to the Markham in January. It sounds like something is pending on that outcome besides the obvious.

And I have to wonder just who is the third party. Could someone explain that in better detail?

And just who has been buying the shares at these low prices and why? I still am wondering who actually owns the 400 million shares "held in Street name".