<Hopefully that's not the motivation for this motion. However, when so many things continue to mount on the side of insiders lining their pockets at the expense of shareholders and everything else, and PTSC shows no changes in its behavior or tactics, it's hard to conclude much else.>

I'd like Ron's professional opinion as to the liklihood of a litigant changing counsel this late in the game and so close to a Markman, in order to obtain some additional funds, most of which will be required to pay the new counsel and potentially risk the entire case? The suggestion that such has occurred seems ludicrous to me, but perhaps I'm missing something.

Opty