nurse: "Welcome to the world of IP.Namely, patented IP.Confidentiality abounds.Get used to it or buy a stock that puts it all out there."

So, if you are implying that it is the norm for an IP company such as TPL not to disclose anything to its dependent clients (i.e. PTSC and Chuck Moore) until it happens, are you not reinforcing that
(a) the PTSC BOD has no way to predict (let alone disclose) quarterly revenue/"earnings" and
(b) the PTSC BOD willingly and knowingly negotiated and entered into one or more contracts with TPL which gave TPL total control over the financial fate of PTSC and thus its shareholders (with the exception of the several failed non-MMP so-called investments made by PTSC)?

If that is so, please tell us how you see that not being a gross breach of fiduciary responsibility.

Even if, by the agreements, PTSC may not publish such information, reasonable cashflow projections are an absolute necessity to run a business. Or does the BOD just assume $0 income on an ongoing basis and let the burn rate of cash reserves do run its course?

Other than Leckrone, TPL and their affiliates, and of course the BOD and Cliff, who else is making any sizeable money out of PTSC? Maybe the landlord. Possibly airlines, car rental agencies and hotels and restaurants (who can audit such expenses with so much secrecy?). Certainly not shareholders.