Hhhmmm... Your response doesn't make any sense. Are you an expert in the industry? An electrical engineer or patent attorney perhaps? Maybe the outcome of contested definitions of this upcoming Markman hearing are so obvious that they shouldn't even have it? Maybe the court should just award all the claim construction diasagreements in favor of our side? If you would, please elaborate further for everyone's benefit on how you determined that the plaintiffs conclusion is either factual or it is not. I thought the court is looking for facts? I look forward to your response.