if our BoD learned about GE and Motorola the same way in which shareholders learned. It would be like Apple all over again. Might we expect another suit against TPL if this were the case? Either the BoD 1)elected not to tell us about those agreements and knew they would be mentioned in a pacer or 2) they are clueless

Not sure if this possibility has been brought up yet or not... but is it possible TPL was using those electronic firms as examples only... not necessarily stating that those particular firms have in fact been licensed...? Could it read this way....? I certainly hope so because if the likes of GE & Motorola have in deed licensed the MMP for what obviously would amount to peanuts then Lawsuits must be filed and the entire lot from stem to stern needs to be uncerimoniously dumped...

If those parties have indeed been licensed, Fiduciary Responsibility has not only been breached but it has been outright nuked..