I'm not sure exactly when the toutorial took palce, but HTC's motion for SJ was to be reviewed at that time.

<At the Tutorial, the parties shall be prepared to address the following procedural history:

(a) A review of Judge Ward’s claim construction order(s);
(b) A review of the PTO’s reexaminations and the impact, if any, those proceedings have on these cases;
(c) A review of the claims identified in Defendant HTC’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement as significant in resolving the Motion.>

Although no reference to item (c) in Judge Ware's March 26th denial of SJ, one might assume that the review did take place. Perhaps more to it than just premature?

Opty