I see what you're looking at, HOWEVER, if you look at the March 6, 2012 Official Gazette where they list the patent as re-certified, THIS below is the language for Claim 29 that was listed as CONFIRMED as PATENTABLE.
http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/patog/week10/OG/ExParteReex.htm
This is DIFFERENT than the "amended claim language" that was previously recertified that you are citing. I'm not sure why they would put THIS language in the Official Gazette if they were still using the "amended claim language" from 2009. Any ideas?
AS A RESULT OF REEXAMINATION, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT: |
The patentability of claim 29 is confirmed. |
Claims 1-28 were not reexamined. |
|
29. In a microprocessor system including a central processing unit, memory, and an instruction register, a method for providing instructions and operands from said memory to said central processing unit comprising the steps of:
providing instruction groups to said instruction register from said memory wherein certain of said instruction groups include at least one instruction that, when executed, causes an access to an operand or an instruction or both, said operand or instruction being located at a predetermined position from a boundary of said instruction groups;
decoding said at least one instruction to determine said predetermined position;
locating said predetermined position; and
supplying, from said instruction groups, using the predetermined location, said operand or instruction or both to said central processing unit.
|