LOL. You don't even seem to be able to read and comprehend anymore. Please show where in my analysis, Leckrone's number is treated as anything resembling "gospel". Oh.. nevermind. You can't, because it's not. In fact, I didn't even MENTION Leckrone or the number he, the HEAD OF THE MMP LICENSING PROGRAM, intimately involved and singularly most knowledgeable about the program, threw out "off the top of his head" at perhaps the most important PUBLIC event in PTSC's annual calendar, its annual shareholder meeting. How could he or any of PTSC's BOD members even think that his utterance of it would be a figure of interest to shareholders.

And with all the talk of how secret the program has to be, and how important it is to gaurd the information regarding license amounts and licensee identities, and how this information must always be very carefully disseminated by PTSC & TPL so as to assure compliance with all of the non-disclosure agreements between themselves as partners and with the licensees, why would anyone think that Dan Leckrone would be ANTYING BUT extremely careless with the total licensing figures to date. Sure, while your point is totally inapplicable to your argument since I NEVER mentioned it in the thread to which you're repsondin, I see your point! lol .. By the way, that's sarcasm in case anyone missed it.

Facts are pesky little things, I know, but I have to ask you in all candor, do you have any idea what you're talking about? Your complaints you cite to BaNosser, have NOTHING to do with what I posted. Exactly how many "unannounced licenses" are you talking about? Are we talking all 20? Or just the 14 known ones?

You do realize, don't you, that the only thing we DON'T know with respect to licenses is the amount of fees collected in the last quarter, and the number of licenses that are actually part of this last quarter. We already KNOW what has been collected in prior quarters, and we have a pretty good idea of how many licenses those prior quarters included. Do YOU have any idea how many of the "over 90" licenses are previous to this pending quarter? Even a guess? No.. I didn't think so. Next time you might consider reviewing the facts and try to real in what appears to be your uncontollable urges to rebut my posts with nonsensical flame throwing.

And I suppose your conclusion that my posting is in an effort to exacerbate a "downdraft on the collective disappointment" is what, so that I can get cheaper shares?! Take over the company? Get on the BOD? Drive them out of business?

What in the rich fantasy life of stillpoint, the anonymous Agoracom flame-throwing poster, do you think I, a 6 year PTSC shareholder, desparate to unload my PTSC shares at something other than an huge loss, would I gain by this exacerbated down draft. Oh, I forgot, those pesky facts don't enter into your analysis. Your here to keep those not paying attention focused on your nonsense. BTW, try not to get sand in your mouth while your head is buried.