<Therefore, the Court‟s current familiarity is of no further use in this case, given that this Court has already performed a claim construction in this case >

In the case that was referenced, the Markman was already done, so no impact of retirement. I read it quickly, so corrections welcomed. But if that is what it said, then what does that say about the importance of the Markman with respect to retirement. Would the same statement apply if no Markman had been made yet?

Opty