If GE was inadvertently mentioned in a prior Pacer, by new counsel trying to get up to speed, I might buy it as an OOOPS moment. However, it is crystal clear from yesterday's PRs by both Patriot and Alliacense that naming GE (twice) was not a mistake. If GE did not want their name mentioned as a licensee you'd think there might be trouble. I think this non disclosure crap is just that. Why is it that they were ready to announce names in 2006, 2007, 2008, etc. What changed in 2012? Hurt the licensing strategy my you know what.

Completely agree

.

From a hike up Mt Wilson.. highest point in Red Rocks AZ

http://photos.imageevent.com/banos/azhiking2010/giant/P5290616_Panorama.jpg

enjoy your weekend!