Hypothetically speaking, say a BOD of a company was involved with Leckrone and said BOD was suing Leckrone for breach of contract, etc. Why, given Leckrone's track record, would a hypothetical BOD settle with a Leckrone without obtaining favorable terms that could be communicated to shareholders? I would appreciate any insight you could provide on this hypothetical situation, and any other hypothetical outcomes from the aforementioned situation.