Good morning Lambert...

..."Therefore, while the T3 are arguing the language must include "non-controllable", when in fact, the MMP ring oscillator IS controllable, but only by the environmental factors wherein it lies, AND by the upper end of the CPU performance. In my understanding, this differentiates us from Talbot and the like because they REQUIRED this external input to provide the performance, and were limited by that external input in the event it was less than the CPU peak performance threshold. Whereas, the MMP ALLOWS for maximum performance regardless of the external inputs. A more proper term, and I think this is more FAVORABLE to us would be NON-LIMITABLE except by the CPUs peformance capacity itself"....

You have summed it up very accurately and succinctly..IMO...

The Judge must get past the semantics,and look to the actual functioning of the device...IMO.