IMHO, For Barco and the T3 to bring up Talbot, having their "Fingers Crossed" hoping that the Judge Ward is stupid as to ignore the USPTO determination on Talbot so that they can "hopefully" win on the 336 by ignorance of the Court.
How would the Judge percieve them (Barco and the T3) when TPL actually provides the information that will put bullet holes in thier request for invalidity based on Talbot?
NOT Good IMO, If I were a judge and found out that they knowningly misrepesented information to the court, I would be highly "pisst".
I am not sure when the T3 and Barco asked the the Judge to dismiss the 336 Based on Talbot if that they did not declare that the USPTO actually looked at that argument and passed the 336.
Which is a big NO NO imo.