<I believe you to be a very sharp guy that reads virtually all the Pacers on this case. I'll assume you just didn't remember.>
I'm sharp enough to know who the plaintiffs are referring to as "Patent Owner" in the Pacer you provided a link to.
Try reading every document produced by examiners in all the reexams. Do you really think the examiners are referring to Moore when they use the term "Patent Owner"?
Opty