I have to wonder why, when asked at the 2012 SHAM, "Under what law or rule did you decide to ignore the Majority vote?" NOT ONE OF THE PTSC BOARD OFFERED THE CORRECT (OR ANY) RESPONSE.

These Board Members publicly avow that each is there because of their experience, expertise and superior knowledge of business law and/or accounting as appropriate.

Is there not therefore a case to be made that their selection is thus based on either fraudulent statements of their capabilities and/or irresponsible and negligent evaluation of them as suitable candidates?