http://photos.imageevent.com/banos/t3/Recomended%20Discovery%20Order%20No%204%20%207-11-12.pdf

Plaintiff, Barco’s, “Motion to Strike Portions of TPL’s Third Amended Infringement

Contention” came on for hearing on July 3, 2012. Extensive briefing and exhibits having

been reviewed and oral argument heard, it is ordered as follows:

The motion is DENIED.

REASONS FOR DECISION

The present motion is based upon local Patent Rule 3-1(c) which requires parties to

“identify specifically where each limitation of each asserted claim is found within each

Accused Instrumentality.” In the present third iteration of TPL’s infringement contentions,

TPL has succeeded in doing this.