The actual dismissal language with the J3 was this:
"Plaintiffs' claims are hereby dismissed with prejudice and Defendant TAEC's counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice."
I believe that means that our claims AGAINST the defendant were dismissed WITH prejudice and thus can NOT be brought up for re-trial, and their COUNTERCLAIMS agains us were what was dismissed WITH prejudice, meaning THEY could revisit the issue down the road.
Unless I'm totally offbase, there is no further recourse with the J3 base on this language (btw, the NEC & Matsushita dismissals read the same way).
I don't think there's a discussion to be had on this unless I have it backwards. Corrections welcome.