I said at the time that I believed that there was no new 3rd party vendor, that it was likely a TPL entity or PDS itself .. well

"On July 11, 2012, we entered into a Licensing Program Services Agreement (the “Program Agreement”) with PDS, TPL, and Alliacense Limited, LLC (“Alliacense”, an affiliate of TPL), and an Agreement (the “TPL Agreement”) with TPL. Pursuant to the Program Agreement, PDS engaged Alliacense to negotiate MMP portfolio licenses and to pursue claims against violators of the MMP portfolio on behalf of PDS, TPL, and the Company. The Program Agreement continues through the useful life of the MMP portfolio patents. Pursuant to the TPL Agreement, we and TPL agreed to certain allocations of obligations in connection with the engagement of Alliacense."

"On July 17, 2012, we entered into an Agreement with PDS, TPL, and Alliacense whereby we agreed to certain additional allocations of obligations relating to the Program Agreement."

Note that there is no new or missing party to the Licensing Program; infact "Alliacense (is) to negotiate" the licenses.