Your quote, Biajj:

"Lets see if this remains true... From PTSC's Corporance Governance :

"During the past ten years, no director, executive officer or nominee for our Board of Directors has been involved in any legal proceedings that are material to an evaluation of their ability or integrity to become our director or executive officer."

The key phrase is "to become". i.e. not "to remain" or "to be". So since he has already "become" a director, there's precious little chance, semantically, that this clause could be used to get rid of him.

We're stymied. The "Shareholder Proposal" approach is dead in the water. Even if Cliff (as Secretary) presents it to the BOD for consideration for a proxy (he once said that he filters what the BOD sees), the BOD will just use the non-binding approach. About the only thing that can break this impasse seems to be a criminal conviction or an SEC ruling. Carlton Johnson once avowed at a SHAM that he puts in far more hours than he should for PTSC. Hard to see how that has ever been true given the work for the other companies and for Swartz, but he probably says the same to the other shareholders too.

Maybe someone owning PPHM stock and eligible to go to their upcoming SHAM in Tustin CA next month could ask the questions from the floor .....