We are named in the Complaint as well and our half ownership is not in question. I didn't read the cited case law supporting the rule. Was there joint ownership where only half was disputed? The ITC must consider our potential harm as well. The infringers have given one remedy to the potential wrong and of course they would want the most severe and damaging to our side. IMO the fact that we are undisputed half owners and party to the complaint will persuade the judge to a much more equitable remedy if any action is taken. Sierra cited our case as well and that has been settled so it is a non issue. Disclose the rest of the details to the court and lets move on.