If the JV broke up and DL lost his MMP ownership interest, we could not prove that the 300 targets were given infringement notices. That would be DL's property. With out prove of notice, we can not go back up to 6 years for damages. We would have to pay him off or give him a ownership interest for this prove of notice data / evidence.

One way or another, PTSC has already paid for at least 50% of the costs of serving all notices either directly to TPL or via PDS or via the TPL 15% "off-the-top".

A thorough audit of PTSC's internal "books" would possibly determine this, but the PTSC BOD resolutely does not undertake such an audit (see the 10-K).

PTSC has an attorney, a CEO/CFO and a 'forensic accountant' on its current Board. Surely it would amount to fiduciary negligence if PTSC directly or via PDS does not have such evidence and proof. It nothing else, such access should and could have been demanded by PTSC as a part of the infamous and suspicious "settlement" in the same way that Dan Leckrone demanded confidentiality and secrecy of the terms of said settlement.