Your argument seems akin to Nabisco asking for the patent claim language to the Oreo being simply

"a cookie"

and claiming that it's a loss or that they didn't want the actual language to read

"A cookie with 2 outer chocolate wafers sandwiching a creamy filling"

Sure, they didn't ask for the more complete description, but they don't lose anything in the more descriptive language. It's not like they would be able to argue that the nutter butter people are infringing on their patent, lol.

By being unwilling to support your argument, you're proving that your argument is unsupportable, it would seem. So I'd say that you're NOT telling the truth with this thread of posts.