The following is from the latest pacer BaNoss kindly posted. Long story short, TPL wants to reschedule dates while maintaining the main target dates set forth in cmc in Sept 2012. Once the T2 realized that TPL contended the clock would not start for the deadline on infringement contention dates, etc., until the claim construction was considered "final", they stated they would not ask the court to "reconsider" the claim construction from Grewal and they would address their issues with the claim construction in summary judgement motions. ----------------------------------------------------------------<<<<<< One day after the Court’s December 5, 2012 Claim Construction Order (877 Doc. 381), Plaintiff HTC indicated that it intended to file a motion seeking additional claim construction. HTC reaffirmed its intention to file such a motion approximately ten days later. Accordingly, TPL understood that the Court’s claim construction would not be considered “final” until resolution of HTC’s motion for further construction; thus, the time for the final infringement contentions had not begun to run. After learning of TPL’s position, on December 21, 2012 (i.e., today’s date), HTC informed TPL that it had decided not to file a motion for further claim construction – but would instead address those issues in connection with summary judgment motions. >>>> My question is the summary judgment motions (plural here and could refer to acer and htc or the T2s vs TPL's) will hopefully refer to our MSJ that will hopefully be filed within the next couple months.