You must've misunderstood my post completely. I'm not sure if you're being intentionally insulting toward me, or simply misread what I wrote.

Cliff Flowers' PTSC stock ownership has not, nor would, influence Acer's posture. I never stated, or implied, that it would.

However, conversely, what I made the observation of in my post is that Acer's position/posture (and that of the other infringers), has clearly contnued to influence Cliff's position so much so that he believes the CORRECT investment decision is to NOT invest in PTSC shares. He's made that decision to not buy one single share even in the context that he's received nearly $2M in total compensation from that same company over the last 5 years. Clearly, his position on this issue, among other things, continues to influence the market in a negative way with respect to new PTSC investment.

While you make it a point to state that you believe it's a good thing that I'm not making decisions for the company, you fail to comment on the wisdom of having a CEO who is so clearly unimpressed with his own company's potential, and so unconfident in his own abilities to steward the company to a higher market valuation, making those decisions.

I know it's working out well for him. How's it working for you? Considering the share price on 7/14/09, the day you joined this forum was 13 cents, and the share price today is 14% lower at 11.2 cents, it would seem, not so well. Guess what, we're in the same boat. Perhaps you should ask the captain to pick up an oar and row a bit as well. You'd be surprised what a little leadership can accomplish.