in the quotes, so I was asking for the source of your statement of fact. I'm asking why you concluded as you did, what's it based on ?

Your post was a reply to Toxic's statement wherein he proclaimed .. "My only point was if we were getting a royalty per chip Quanta wouldn't come into play".

Quanta may likely be a significant influence on our situation, yet both your and his statements are written as being factual implications of Quanta and how it relates to our situation.

I am only asking for the basis of authority you can direct me to that indicates that we do not charge a per chip royalty. I ask because perhaps I've missed something. There are MMP legal documents which have broken down "per chip" license costs.

"Do you think we are getting paid royalties?" Yes, the one time license fees we've collected are a lump sum "royalty"; for past and future use. If you are writing about continuing royalties going forward, as far as I know, only AMD has agreed to continuing royalties if they produce the Ignite chip.